The presentation of this argument in a webcomic lets the author illustrate his or her point and make the argument clear. The comic begins with a broad comparison of the two conflicting ideals and then sums up the entire claim in a single statement with two pictures. The pictures really add to what the author is trying to say; they show what the statement above the illustration means and why it’s important. I personally would not have chosen to use this form of persuasion, but the idea of the comic comes across very strongly at the end. He or she could have used a video or essay, but in this case the webcomic does more than either of these forms of presentation could have. Although I wouldn’t have chosen to use a webcomic, the author does an excellent job in showing how both the deprivation and indulgence of information has and/or will affect or society.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Orwell vs. Huxley
The two conflicting arguments that are made in the webcomic are
ones of extremes. Orwell’s fantasy world is one where the average person is
deprived of the information that lets us thrive, such as books and the right to
an opinion. On the other hand, Huxley’s “World State” has made citizens passive
and apathetic based on the idea that everything we care about is superficial. That
is to say that we care more about how many Facebook friends we have than why
the stock market has recently been failing. All the new social media sites are
fantastic and keep us in touch with one another, but what do they do to better
us as people? Truthfully, I cannot think of one way the social media era has
improved our society. Yes, we know what Sally did 2 hours ago and who’s
cheering for the Cats this weekend but who the hell cares? There is so much
more to life than your social identity. I believe the social media aspect of our
generation has resulted in social awkwardness and dependence on technology. As
technology advances we need to become aware of the consequences that it is
having on our mentalities. If we can recognize that more attention needs to be
paid to bigger issues in the world than Facebook and Twitter, then we can successfully use
this incredible technology to our advantage, not let it distract us.
The presentation of this argument in a webcomic lets the author illustrate his or her point and make the argument clear. The comic begins with a broad comparison of the two conflicting ideals and then sums up the entire claim in a single statement with two pictures. The pictures really add to what the author is trying to say; they show what the statement above the illustration means and why it’s important. I personally would not have chosen to use this form of persuasion, but the idea of the comic comes across very strongly at the end. He or she could have used a video or essay, but in this case the webcomic does more than either of these forms of presentation could have. Although I wouldn’t have chosen to use a webcomic, the author does an excellent job in showing how both the deprivation and indulgence of information has and/or will affect or society.
The presentation of this argument in a webcomic lets the author illustrate his or her point and make the argument clear. The comic begins with a broad comparison of the two conflicting ideals and then sums up the entire claim in a single statement with two pictures. The pictures really add to what the author is trying to say; they show what the statement above the illustration means and why it’s important. I personally would not have chosen to use this form of persuasion, but the idea of the comic comes across very strongly at the end. He or she could have used a video or essay, but in this case the webcomic does more than either of these forms of presentation could have. Although I wouldn’t have chosen to use a webcomic, the author does an excellent job in showing how both the deprivation and indulgence of information has and/or will affect or society.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Honey Boo Boo
The fact that we, as Americans, are viewing a video
of a person committing suicide a couple hundred thousand times says something
about the direction in which our society is headed. The more disturbing and
shocking a video is, the more people flock to it. Just as the video of Tony
Scott’s suicide interested us, the outlandish Honey Boo Boo character also
tweaks our interest. Why does this little 6 year old attract over 2 million
viewers? Because she’s a child that the average person has never seen before.
The thought of a mother giving her daughter liquid crack to do better while she
dances and lip-syncs is something that we wouldn’t even imagine happening. This
is exactly why were so drawn to it. We can sit on our couch and watch this
crazy munchkin and her equally as repulsive mother live their sorry pathetic
lives while we laugh.
Albom’s views these two videos as the “melting of our humanity.” I agree to a certain extent. I
see the melting of our humanity more when I think of the gruesome movies that
Hollywood releases in the modern era. After watching Hostel and Last House on the
Left I felt numb and shocked beyond belief. My only thought was how could
someone actually make a movie that depicts acts so horrifically real as
entertainment? Both forms of entertainment contribute to the “melting of our
humanity,” but I find it more disturbing that movies depict these grisly acts
than watching a crack baby do pageants. The two are related though, in the way
both forms of entertainment shock us. We want to be surprised, we want to see
something that’s going to make us uneasy; it is simply what the American
entertainment system is feeding off of at this point in time.
The final question
Albom presents is: is reality TV making us apathetic? I completely
agree with him. Why save a man’s life, when watching him die will get you hits
on YouTube? Why try to sort out this circus of a family when we can simply amuse
ourselves from their pitiful excuse of a life? We would rather enjoy the show than
to do anything to stop it and from all the new reality shows coming to our
attention, the trend will only continue to get worse.
Sunday, August 26, 2012
The Scam of Reality Television
When I think of reality television, the primary show that
pops into my head is Jersey Shore.
Back in the glory days of high school I used to feast on the crap that is shown
on MTV. Freshmen and sophomore year, I couldn’t wait for “JersDay.” I wanted to
be Pauly D and Vinny. I wanted to tan and look like someone out of a Muscle & Fitness magazine. The more I
watched the show, the more I realized that these people live the life of gods.
Sure they sometimes don’t get along, but they get paid to party! My conception
of reality was that somewhere people actually can maintain a functioning
lifestyle of these “celebrities” that I idolized. I soon began to wonder that if
this show is in fact reality, then why isn’t my life so magnificent to where I can
get paid to drink, go to clubs, and have sex? “Reality television” is merely an
expression used to twist the image that people have of life. No one actually
lives as the stars of Jersey Shore do, and the sooner the men and women of our
generation realize this, the better. I am merely using this show as an example
because I became so infatuated with the Jersey Shore lifestyle. All reality
television shows are using this same lie to keep the money flowing. Keeping up
with the Kardashians and The Bachelor all use this concept of reality to
maintain the mindset that people actually live their lives like this. The only “real”
part of reality television is the money that the producers make from scripting
the show. The shows are in fact interesting which is why they’re so much fun to
watch. If the producer didn’t spice up the show, then no one would give the
show another chance. It would be boring and quite ordinary, just like the lives
of every other citizen. “Reality television” is a scam.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)